Documents Ganeti version 2.3
Contents
This document serves as a more example-oriented guide to Ganeti; while the administration guide shows a conceptual approach, here you will find a step-by-step example to managing instances and the cluster.
Our simulated, example cluster will have three machines, named node1, node2, node3. Note that in real life machines will usually FQDNs but here we use short names for brevity. We will use a secondary network for replication data, 192.0.2.0/24, with nodes having the last octet the same as their index. The cluster name will be example-cluster. All nodes have the same simulated hardware configuration, two disks of 750GB, 32GB of memory and 4 CPUs.
On this cluster, we will create up to seven instances, named instance1 to instance7.
Follow the Ganeti installation tutorial document and prepare the nodes. Then it’s time to initialise the cluster:
node1# gnt-cluster init -s 192.0.2.1 --enabled-hypervisors=xen-pvm example-cluster
node1#
The creation was fine. Let’s check that one node we have is functioning correctly:
node1# gnt-node list
Node DTotal DFree MTotal MNode MFree Pinst Sinst
node1 1.3T 1.3T 32.0G 1.0G 30.5G 0 0
node1# gnt-cluster verify
Mon Oct 26 02:08:51 2009 * Verifying global settings
Mon Oct 26 02:08:51 2009 * Gathering data (1 nodes)
Mon Oct 26 02:08:52 2009 * Verifying node status
Mon Oct 26 02:08:52 2009 * Verifying instance status
Mon Oct 26 02:08:52 2009 * Verifying orphan volumes
Mon Oct 26 02:08:52 2009 * Verifying remaining instances
Mon Oct 26 02:08:52 2009 * Verifying N+1 Memory redundancy
Mon Oct 26 02:08:52 2009 * Other Notes
Mon Oct 26 02:08:52 2009 * Hooks Results
node1#
Since this proceeded correctly, let’s add the other two nodes:
node1# gnt-node add -s 192.0.2.2 node2
-- WARNING --
Performing this operation is going to replace the ssh daemon keypair
on the target machine (node2) with the ones of the current one
and grant full intra-cluster ssh root access to/from it
The authenticity of host 'node2 (192.0.2.2)' can't be established.
RSA key fingerprint is 9f:…
Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes
root@node2's password:
Mon Oct 26 02:11:54 2009 - INFO: Node will be a master candidate
node1# gnt-node add -s 192.0.2.3 node3
-- WARNING --
Performing this operation is going to replace the ssh daemon keypair
on the target machine (node2) with the ones of the current one
and grant full intra-cluster ssh root access to/from it
The authenticity of host 'node3 (192.0.2.3)' can't be established.
RSA key fingerprint is 9f:…
Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes
root@node2's password:
Mon Oct 26 02:11:54 2009 - INFO: Node will be a master candidate
Checking the cluster status again:
node1# gnt-node list
Node DTotal DFree MTotal MNode MFree Pinst Sinst
node1 1.3T 1.3T 32.0G 1.0G 30.5G 0 0
node2 1.3T 1.3T 32.0G 1.0G 30.5G 0 0
node3 1.3T 1.3T 32.0G 1.0G 30.5G 0 0
node1# gnt-cluster verify
Mon Oct 26 02:15:14 2009 * Verifying global settings
Mon Oct 26 02:15:14 2009 * Gathering data (3 nodes)
Mon Oct 26 02:15:16 2009 * Verifying node status
Mon Oct 26 02:15:16 2009 * Verifying instance status
Mon Oct 26 02:15:16 2009 * Verifying orphan volumes
Mon Oct 26 02:15:16 2009 * Verifying remaining instances
Mon Oct 26 02:15:16 2009 * Verifying N+1 Memory redundancy
Mon Oct 26 02:15:16 2009 * Other Notes
Mon Oct 26 02:15:16 2009 * Hooks Results
node1#
And let’s check that we have a valid OS:
node1# gnt-os list
Name
debootstrap
node1#
Now that the cluster is created, it is time to check that the hardware works correctly, that the hypervisor can actually create instances, etc. This is done via the debootstrap tool as described in the admin guide. Similar output lines are replaced with … in the below log:
node1# /usr/lib/ganeti/tools/burnin -o debootstrap -p instance{1..5}
- Testing global parameters
- Creating instances
* instance instance1
on node1, node2
* instance instance2
on node2, node3
…
* instance instance5
on node2, node3
* Submitted job ID(s) 157, 158, 159, 160, 161
waiting for job 157 for instance1
…
waiting for job 161 for instance5
- Replacing disks on the same nodes
* instance instance1
run replace_on_secondary
run replace_on_primary
…
* instance instance5
run replace_on_secondary
run replace_on_primary
* Submitted job ID(s) 162, 163, 164, 165, 166
waiting for job 162 for instance1
…
- Changing the secondary node
* instance instance1
run replace_new_secondary node3
* instance instance2
run replace_new_secondary node1
…
* instance instance5
run replace_new_secondary node1
* Submitted job ID(s) 167, 168, 169, 170, 171
waiting for job 167 for instance1
…
- Growing disks
* instance instance1
increase disk/0 by 128 MB
…
* instance instance5
increase disk/0 by 128 MB
* Submitted job ID(s) 173, 174, 175, 176, 177
waiting for job 173 for instance1
…
- Failing over instances
* instance instance1
…
* instance instance5
* Submitted job ID(s) 179, 180, 181, 182, 183
waiting for job 179 for instance1
…
- Migrating instances
* instance instance1
migration and migration cleanup
…
* instance instance5
migration and migration cleanup
* Submitted job ID(s) 184, 185, 186, 187, 188
waiting for job 184 for instance1
…
- Exporting and re-importing instances
* instance instance1
export to node node3
remove instance
import from node3 to node1, node2
remove export
…
* instance instance5
export to node node1
remove instance
import from node1 to node2, node3
remove export
* Submitted job ID(s) 196, 197, 198, 199, 200
waiting for job 196 for instance1
…
- Reinstalling instances
* instance instance1
reinstall without passing the OS
reinstall specifying the OS
…
* instance instance5
reinstall without passing the OS
reinstall specifying the OS
* Submitted job ID(s) 203, 204, 205, 206, 207
waiting for job 203 for instance1
…
- Rebooting instances
* instance instance1
reboot with type 'hard'
reboot with type 'soft'
reboot with type 'full'
…
* instance instance5
reboot with type 'hard'
reboot with type 'soft'
reboot with type 'full'
* Submitted job ID(s) 208, 209, 210, 211, 212
waiting for job 208 for instance1
…
- Adding and removing disks
* instance instance1
adding a disk
removing last disk
…
* instance instance5
adding a disk
removing last disk
* Submitted job ID(s) 213, 214, 215, 216, 217
waiting for job 213 for instance1
…
- Adding and removing NICs
* instance instance1
adding a NIC
removing last NIC
…
* instance instance5
adding a NIC
removing last NIC
* Submitted job ID(s) 218, 219, 220, 221, 222
waiting for job 218 for instance1
…
- Activating/deactivating disks
* instance instance1
activate disks when online
activate disks when offline
deactivate disks (when offline)
…
* instance instance5
activate disks when online
activate disks when offline
deactivate disks (when offline)
* Submitted job ID(s) 223, 224, 225, 226, 227
waiting for job 223 for instance1
…
- Stopping and starting instances
* instance instance1
…
* instance instance5
* Submitted job ID(s) 230, 231, 232, 233, 234
waiting for job 230 for instance1
…
- Removing instances
* instance instance1
…
* instance instance5
* Submitted job ID(s) 235, 236, 237, 238, 239
waiting for job 235 for instance1
…
node1#
You can see in the above what operations the burnin does. Ideally, the burnin log would proceed successfully through all the steps and end cleanly, without throwing errors.
At this point, Ganeti and the hardware seems to be functioning correctly, so we’ll follow up with creating the instances manually:
node1# gnt-instance add -t drbd -o debootstrap -s 256m -n node1:node2 instance3
Mon Oct 26 04:06:52 2009 - INFO: Selected nodes for instance instance1 via iallocator hail: node2, node3
Mon Oct 26 04:06:53 2009 * creating instance disks...
Mon Oct 26 04:06:57 2009 adding instance instance1 to cluster config
Mon Oct 26 04:06:57 2009 - INFO: Waiting for instance instance1 to sync disks.
Mon Oct 26 04:06:57 2009 - INFO: - device disk/0: 20.00% done, 4 estimated seconds remaining
Mon Oct 26 04:07:01 2009 - INFO: Instance instance1's disks are in sync.
Mon Oct 26 04:07:01 2009 creating os for instance instance1 on node node2
Mon Oct 26 04:07:01 2009 * running the instance OS create scripts...
Mon Oct 26 04:07:14 2009 * starting instance...
node1# gnt-instance add -t drbd -o debootstrap -s 256m -n node1:node2 instanc<drbd -o debootstrap -s 256m -n node1:node2 instance2
Mon Oct 26 04:11:37 2009 * creating instance disks...
Mon Oct 26 04:11:40 2009 adding instance instance2 to cluster config
Mon Oct 26 04:11:41 2009 - INFO: Waiting for instance instance2 to sync disks.
Mon Oct 26 04:11:41 2009 - INFO: - device disk/0: 35.40% done, 1 estimated seconds remaining
Mon Oct 26 04:11:42 2009 - INFO: - device disk/0: 58.50% done, 1 estimated seconds remaining
Mon Oct 26 04:11:43 2009 - INFO: - device disk/0: 86.20% done, 0 estimated seconds remaining
Mon Oct 26 04:11:44 2009 - INFO: - device disk/0: 92.40% done, 0 estimated seconds remaining
Mon Oct 26 04:11:44 2009 - INFO: - device disk/0: 97.00% done, 0 estimated seconds remaining
Mon Oct 26 04:11:44 2009 - INFO: Instance instance2's disks are in sync.
Mon Oct 26 04:11:44 2009 creating os for instance instance2 on node node1
Mon Oct 26 04:11:44 2009 * running the instance OS create scripts...
Mon Oct 26 04:11:57 2009 * starting instance...
node1#
The above shows one instance created via an iallocator script, and one being created with manual node assignment. The other three instances were also created and now it’s time to check them:
node1# gnt-instance list
Instance Hypervisor OS Primary_node Status Memory
instance1 xen-pvm debootstrap node2 running 128M
instance2 xen-pvm debootstrap node1 running 128M
instance3 xen-pvm debootstrap node1 running 128M
instance4 xen-pvm debootstrap node3 running 128M
instance5 xen-pvm debootstrap node2 running 128M
Accessing an instance’s console is easy:
node1# gnt-instance console instance2
[ 0.000000] Bootdata ok (command line is root=/dev/sda1 ro)
[ 0.000000] Linux version 2.6…
[ 0.000000] BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
[ 0.000000] Xen: 0000000000000000 - 0000000008800000 (usable)
[13138176.018071] Built 1 zonelists. Total pages: 34816
[13138176.018074] Kernel command line: root=/dev/sda1 ro
[13138176.018694] Initializing CPU#0
…
Checking file systems...fsck 1.41.3 (12-Oct-2008)
done.
Setting kernel variables (/etc/sysctl.conf)...done.
Mounting local filesystems...done.
Activating swapfile swap...done.
Setting up networking....
Configuring network interfaces...done.
Setting console screen modes and fonts.
INIT: Entering runlevel: 2
Starting enhanced syslogd: rsyslogd.
Starting periodic command scheduler: crond.
Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 instance2 tty1
instance2 login:
At this moment you can login to the instance and, after configuring the network (and doing this on all instances), we can check their connectivity:
node1# fping instance{1..5}
instance1 is alive
instance2 is alive
instance3 is alive
instance4 is alive
instance5 is alive
node1#
We are now left with four instances. Assume that at this point, node3, which has one primary and one secondary instance, crashes:
node1# gnt-node info node3
Node name: node3
primary ip: 198.51.100.1
secondary ip: 192.0.2.3
master candidate: True
drained: False
offline: False
primary for instances:
- instance4
secondary for instances:
- instance1
node1# fping node3
node3 is unreachable
At this point, the primary instance of that node (instance4) is down, but the secondary instance (instance1) is not affected except it has lost disk redundancy:
node1# fping instance{1,4}
instance1 is alive
instance4 is unreachable
node1#
If we try to check the status of instance4 via the instance info command, it fails because it tries to contact node3 which is down:
node1# gnt-instance info instance4
Failure: command execution error:
Error checking node node3: Connection failed (113: No route to host)
node1#
So we need to mark node3 as being offline, and thus Ganeti won’t talk to it anymore:
node1# gnt-node modify -O yes -f node3
Mon Oct 26 04:34:12 2009 - WARNING: Not enough master candidates (desired 10, new value will be 2)
Mon Oct 26 04:34:15 2009 - WARNING: Communication failure to node node3: Connection failed (113: No route to host)
Modified node node3
- offline -> True
- master_candidate -> auto-demotion due to offline
node1#
And now we can failover the instance:
node1# gnt-instance failover --ignore-consistency instance4
Failover will happen to image instance4. This requires a shutdown of
the instance. Continue?
y/[n]/?: y
Mon Oct 26 04:35:34 2009 * checking disk consistency between source and target
Failure: command execution error:
Disk disk/0 is degraded on target node, aborting failover.
node1# gnt-instance failover --ignore-consistency instance4
Failover will happen to image instance4. This requires a shutdown of
the instance. Continue?
y/[n]/?: y
Mon Oct 26 04:35:47 2009 * checking disk consistency between source and target
Mon Oct 26 04:35:47 2009 * shutting down instance on source node
Mon Oct 26 04:35:47 2009 - WARNING: Could not shutdown instance instance4 on node node3. Proceeding anyway. Please make sure node node3 is down. Error details: Node is marked offline
Mon Oct 26 04:35:47 2009 * deactivating the instance's disks on source node
Mon Oct 26 04:35:47 2009 - WARNING: Could not shutdown block device disk/0 on node node3: Node is marked offline
Mon Oct 26 04:35:47 2009 * activating the instance's disks on target node
Mon Oct 26 04:35:47 2009 - WARNING: Could not prepare block device disk/0 on node node3 (is_primary=False, pass=1): Node is marked offline
Mon Oct 26 04:35:48 2009 * starting the instance on the target node
node1#
Note in our first attempt, Ganeti refused to do the failover since it wasn’t sure what is the status of the instance’s disks. We pass the --ignore-consistency flag and then we can failover:
node1# gnt-instance list
Instance Hypervisor OS Primary_node Status Memory
instance1 xen-pvm debootstrap node2 running 128M
instance2 xen-pvm debootstrap node1 running 128M
instance3 xen-pvm debootstrap node1 running 128M
instance4 xen-pvm debootstrap node1 running 128M
node1#
But at this point, both instance1 and instance4 are without disk redundancy:
node1# gnt-instance info instance1
Instance name: instance1
UUID: 45173e82-d1fa-417c-8758-7d582ab7eef4
Serial number: 2
Creation time: 2009-10-26 04:06:57
Modification time: 2009-10-26 04:07:14
State: configured to be up, actual state is up
Nodes:
- primary: node2
- secondaries: node3
Operating system: debootstrap
Allocated network port: None
Hypervisor: xen-pvm
- root_path: default (/dev/sda1)
- kernel_args: default (ro)
- use_bootloader: default (False)
- bootloader_args: default ()
- bootloader_path: default ()
- kernel_path: default (/boot/vmlinuz-2.6-xenU)
- initrd_path: default ()
Hardware:
- VCPUs: 1
- memory: 128MiB
- NICs:
- nic/0: MAC: aa:00:00:78:da:63, IP: None, mode: bridged, link: xen-br0
Disks:
- disk/0: drbd8, size 256M
access mode: rw
nodeA: node2, minor=0
nodeB: node3, minor=0
port: 11035
auth key: 8e950e3cec6854b0181fbc3a6058657701f2d458
on primary: /dev/drbd0 (147:0) in sync, status *DEGRADED*
child devices:
- child 0: lvm, size 256M
logical_id: xenvg/22459cf8-117d-4bea-a1aa-791667d07800.disk0_data
on primary: /dev/xenvg/22459cf8-117d-4bea-a1aa-791667d07800.disk0_data (254:0)
- child 1: lvm, size 128M
logical_id: xenvg/22459cf8-117d-4bea-a1aa-791667d07800.disk0_meta
on primary: /dev/xenvg/22459cf8-117d-4bea-a1aa-791667d07800.disk0_meta (254:1)
The output is similar for instance4. In order to recover this, we need to run the node evacuate command which will change from the current secondary node to a new one (in this case, we only have two working nodes, so all instances will be end on nodes one and two):
node1# gnt-node evacuate -I hail node3
Relocate instance(s) 'instance1','instance4' from node
node3 using iallocator hail?
y/[n]/?: y
Mon Oct 26 05:05:39 2009 - INFO: Selected new secondary for instance 'instance1': node1
Mon Oct 26 05:05:40 2009 - INFO: Selected new secondary for instance 'instance4': node2
Mon Oct 26 05:05:40 2009 Replacing disk(s) 0 for instance1
Mon Oct 26 05:05:40 2009 STEP 1/6 Check device existence
Mon Oct 26 05:05:40 2009 - INFO: Checking disk/0 on node2
Mon Oct 26 05:05:40 2009 - INFO: Checking volume groups
Mon Oct 26 05:05:40 2009 STEP 2/6 Check peer consistency
Mon Oct 26 05:05:40 2009 - INFO: Checking disk/0 consistency on node node2
Mon Oct 26 05:05:40 2009 STEP 3/6 Allocate new storage
Mon Oct 26 05:05:40 2009 - INFO: Adding new local storage on node1 for disk/0
Mon Oct 26 05:05:41 2009 STEP 4/6 Changing drbd configuration
Mon Oct 26 05:05:41 2009 - INFO: activating a new drbd on node1 for disk/0
Mon Oct 26 05:05:42 2009 - INFO: Shutting down drbd for disk/0 on old node
Mon Oct 26 05:05:42 2009 - WARNING: Failed to shutdown drbd for disk/0 on oldnode: Node is marked offline
Mon Oct 26 05:05:42 2009 Hint: Please cleanup this device manually as soon as possible
Mon Oct 26 05:05:42 2009 - INFO: Detaching primary drbds from the network (=> standalone)
Mon Oct 26 05:05:42 2009 - INFO: Updating instance configuration
Mon Oct 26 05:05:45 2009 - INFO: Attaching primary drbds to new secondary (standalone => connected)
Mon Oct 26 05:05:46 2009 STEP 5/6 Sync devices
Mon Oct 26 05:05:46 2009 - INFO: Waiting for instance instance1 to sync disks.
Mon Oct 26 05:05:46 2009 - INFO: - device disk/0: 13.90% done, 7 estimated seconds remaining
Mon Oct 26 05:05:53 2009 - INFO: Instance instance1's disks are in sync.
Mon Oct 26 05:05:53 2009 STEP 6/6 Removing old storage
Mon Oct 26 05:05:53 2009 - INFO: Remove logical volumes for 0
Mon Oct 26 05:05:53 2009 - WARNING: Can't remove old LV: Node is marked offline
Mon Oct 26 05:05:53 2009 Hint: remove unused LVs manually
Mon Oct 26 05:05:53 2009 - WARNING: Can't remove old LV: Node is marked offline
Mon Oct 26 05:05:53 2009 Hint: remove unused LVs manually
Mon Oct 26 05:05:53 2009 Replacing disk(s) 0 for instance4
Mon Oct 26 05:05:53 2009 STEP 1/6 Check device existence
Mon Oct 26 05:05:53 2009 - INFO: Checking disk/0 on node1
Mon Oct 26 05:05:53 2009 - INFO: Checking volume groups
Mon Oct 26 05:05:53 2009 STEP 2/6 Check peer consistency
Mon Oct 26 05:05:53 2009 - INFO: Checking disk/0 consistency on node node1
Mon Oct 26 05:05:54 2009 STEP 3/6 Allocate new storage
Mon Oct 26 05:05:54 2009 - INFO: Adding new local storage on node2 for disk/0
Mon Oct 26 05:05:54 2009 STEP 4/6 Changing drbd configuration
Mon Oct 26 05:05:54 2009 - INFO: activating a new drbd on node2 for disk/0
Mon Oct 26 05:05:55 2009 - INFO: Shutting down drbd for disk/0 on old node
Mon Oct 26 05:05:55 2009 - WARNING: Failed to shutdown drbd for disk/0 on oldnode: Node is marked offline
Mon Oct 26 05:05:55 2009 Hint: Please cleanup this device manually as soon as possible
Mon Oct 26 05:05:55 2009 - INFO: Detaching primary drbds from the network (=> standalone)
Mon Oct 26 05:05:55 2009 - INFO: Updating instance configuration
Mon Oct 26 05:05:55 2009 - INFO: Attaching primary drbds to new secondary (standalone => connected)
Mon Oct 26 05:05:56 2009 STEP 5/6 Sync devices
Mon Oct 26 05:05:56 2009 - INFO: Waiting for instance instance4 to sync disks.
Mon Oct 26 05:05:56 2009 - INFO: - device disk/0: 12.40% done, 8 estimated seconds remaining
Mon Oct 26 05:06:04 2009 - INFO: Instance instance4's disks are in sync.
Mon Oct 26 05:06:04 2009 STEP 6/6 Removing old storage
Mon Oct 26 05:06:04 2009 - INFO: Remove logical volumes for 0
Mon Oct 26 05:06:04 2009 - WARNING: Can't remove old LV: Node is marked offline
Mon Oct 26 05:06:04 2009 Hint: remove unused LVs manually
Mon Oct 26 05:06:04 2009 - WARNING: Can't remove old LV: Node is marked offline
Mon Oct 26 05:06:04 2009 Hint: remove unused LVs manually
node1#
And now node3 is completely free of instances and can be repaired:
node1# gnt-node list
Node DTotal DFree MTotal MNode MFree Pinst Sinst
node1 1.3T 1.3T 32.0G 1.0G 30.2G 3 1
node2 1.3T 1.3T 32.0G 1.0G 30.4G 1 3
node3 ? ? ? ? ? 0 0
Let’s say node3 has been repaired and is now ready to be reused. Re-adding it is simple:
node1# gnt-node add --readd node3
The authenticity of host 'node3 (198.51.100.1)' can't be established.
RSA key fingerprint is 9f:2e:5a:2e:e0:bd:00:09:e4:5c:32:f2:27:57:7a:f4.
Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes
Mon Oct 26 05:27:39 2009 - INFO: Readding a node, the offline/drained flags were reset
Mon Oct 26 05:27:39 2009 - INFO: Node will be a master candidate
And is now working again:
node1# gnt-node list
Node DTotal DFree MTotal MNode MFree Pinst Sinst
node1 1.3T 1.3T 32.0G 1.0G 30.2G 3 1
node2 1.3T 1.3T 32.0G 1.0G 30.4G 1 3
node3 1.3T 1.3T 32.0G 1.0G 30.4G 0 0
Note
If you have the ganeti-htools package installed, you can shuffle the instances around to have a better use of the nodes.
A disk failure is simpler than a full node failure. First, a single disk failure should not cause data-loss for any redundant instance; only the performance of some instances might be reduced due to more network traffic.
Let take the cluster status in the above listing, and check what volumes are in use:
node1# gnt-node volumes -o phys,instance node2
PhysDev Instance
/dev/sdb1 instance4
/dev/sdb1 instance4
/dev/sdb1 instance1
/dev/sdb1 instance1
/dev/sdb1 instance3
/dev/sdb1 instance3
/dev/sdb1 instance2
/dev/sdb1 instance2
node1#
You can see that all instances on node2 have logical volumes on /dev/sdb1. Let’s simulate a disk failure on that disk:
node1# ssh node2
node2# echo offline > /sys/block/sdb/device/state
node2# vgs
/dev/sdb1: read failed after 0 of 4096 at 0: Input/output error
/dev/sdb1: read failed after 0 of 4096 at 750153695232: Input/output error
/dev/sdb1: read failed after 0 of 4096 at 0: Input/output error
Couldn't find device with uuid '954bJA-mNL0-7ydj-sdpW-nc2C-ZrCi-zFp91c'.
Couldn't find all physical volumes for volume group xenvg.
/dev/sdb1: read failed after 0 of 4096 at 0: Input/output error
/dev/sdb1: read failed after 0 of 4096 at 0: Input/output error
Couldn't find device with uuid '954bJA-mNL0-7ydj-sdpW-nc2C-ZrCi-zFp91c'.
Couldn't find all physical volumes for volume group xenvg.
Volume group xenvg not found
node2#
At this point, the node is broken and if we are to examine instance2 we get (simplified output shown):
node1# gnt-instance info instance2
Instance name: instance2
State: configured to be up, actual state is up
Nodes:
- primary: node1
- secondaries: node2
Disks:
- disk/0: drbd8, size 256M
on primary: /dev/drbd0 (147:0) in sync, status ok
on secondary: /dev/drbd1 (147:1) in sync, status *DEGRADED* *MISSING DISK*
This instance has a secondary only on node2. Let’s verify a primary instance of node2:
node1# gnt-instance info instance1
Instance name: instance1
State: configured to be up, actual state is up
Nodes:
- primary: node2
- secondaries: node1
Disks:
- disk/0: drbd8, size 256M
on primary: /dev/drbd0 (147:0) in sync, status *DEGRADED* *MISSING DISK*
on secondary: /dev/drbd3 (147:3) in sync, status ok
node1# gnt-instance console instance1
Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 instance1 tty1
instance1 login: root
Last login: Tue Oct 27 01:24:09 UTC 2009 on tty1
instance1:~# date > test
instance1:~# sync
instance1:~# cat test
Tue Oct 27 01:25:20 UTC 2009
instance1:~# dmesg|tail
[5439785.235448] NET: Registered protocol family 15
[5439785.235489] 802.1Q VLAN Support v1.8 Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
[5439785.235495] All bugs added by David S. Miller <davem@redhat.com>
[5439785.235517] XENBUS: Device with no driver: device/console/0
[5439785.236576] kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
[5439785.236588] EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
[5439785.236625] VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) readonly.
[5439785.236663] Freeing unused kernel memory: 172k freed
[5439787.533779] EXT3 FS on sda1, internal journal
[5440655.065431] eth0: no IPv6 routers present
instance1:~#
As you can see, the instance is running fine and doesn’t see any disk issues. It is now time to fix node2 and re-establish redundancy for the involved instances.
Note
For Ganeti 2.0 we need to fix manually the volume group on node2 by running vgreduce --removemissing xenvg
node1# gnt-node repair-storage node2 lvm-vg xenvg
Mon Oct 26 18:14:03 2009 Repairing storage unit 'xenvg' on node2 ...
node1# ssh node2 vgs
VG #PV #LV #SN Attr VSize VFree
xenvg 1 8 0 wz--n- 673.84G 673.84G
node1#
This has removed the ‘bad’ disk from the volume group, which is now left with only one PV. We can now replace the disks for the involved instances:
node1# for i in instance{1..4}; do gnt-instance replace-disks -a $i; done
Mon Oct 26 18:15:38 2009 Replacing disk(s) 0 for instance1
Mon Oct 26 18:15:38 2009 STEP 1/6 Check device existence
Mon Oct 26 18:15:38 2009 - INFO: Checking disk/0 on node1
Mon Oct 26 18:15:38 2009 - INFO: Checking disk/0 on node2
Mon Oct 26 18:15:38 2009 - INFO: Checking volume groups
Mon Oct 26 18:15:38 2009 STEP 2/6 Check peer consistency
Mon Oct 26 18:15:38 2009 - INFO: Checking disk/0 consistency on node node1
Mon Oct 26 18:15:39 2009 STEP 3/6 Allocate new storage
Mon Oct 26 18:15:39 2009 - INFO: Adding storage on node2 for disk/0
Mon Oct 26 18:15:39 2009 STEP 4/6 Changing drbd configuration
Mon Oct 26 18:15:39 2009 - INFO: Detaching disk/0 drbd from local storage
Mon Oct 26 18:15:40 2009 - INFO: Renaming the old LVs on the target node
Mon Oct 26 18:15:40 2009 - INFO: Renaming the new LVs on the target node
Mon Oct 26 18:15:40 2009 - INFO: Adding new mirror component on node2
Mon Oct 26 18:15:41 2009 STEP 5/6 Sync devices
Mon Oct 26 18:15:41 2009 - INFO: Waiting for instance instance1 to sync disks.
Mon Oct 26 18:15:41 2009 - INFO: - device disk/0: 12.40% done, 9 estimated seconds remaining
Mon Oct 26 18:15:50 2009 - INFO: Instance instance1's disks are in sync.
Mon Oct 26 18:15:50 2009 STEP 6/6 Removing old storage
Mon Oct 26 18:15:50 2009 - INFO: Remove logical volumes for disk/0
Mon Oct 26 18:15:52 2009 Replacing disk(s) 0 for instance2
Mon Oct 26 18:15:52 2009 STEP 1/6 Check device existence
…
Mon Oct 26 18:16:01 2009 STEP 6/6 Removing old storage
Mon Oct 26 18:16:01 2009 - INFO: Remove logical volumes for disk/0
Mon Oct 26 18:16:02 2009 Replacing disk(s) 0 for instance3
Mon Oct 26 18:16:02 2009 STEP 1/6 Check device existence
…
Mon Oct 26 18:16:09 2009 STEP 6/6 Removing old storage
Mon Oct 26 18:16:09 2009 - INFO: Remove logical volumes for disk/0
Mon Oct 26 18:16:10 2009 Replacing disk(s) 0 for instance4
Mon Oct 26 18:16:10 2009 STEP 1/6 Check device existence
…
Mon Oct 26 18:16:18 2009 STEP 6/6 Removing old storage
Mon Oct 26 18:16:18 2009 - INFO: Remove logical volumes for disk/0
node1#
As this point, all instances should be healthy again.
Note
Ganeti 2.0 doesn’t have the -a option to replace-disks, so for it you have to run the loop twice, once over primary instances with argument -p and once secondary instances with argument -s, but otherwise the operations are similar:
node1# gnt-instance replace-disks -p instance1
…
node1# for i in instance{2..4}; do gnt-instance replace-disks -s $i; done
There are a number of small issues that might appear on a cluster that can be solved easily as long as the issue is properly identified. For this exercise we will consider the case of node3, which was broken previously and re-added to the cluster without reinstallation. Running cluster verify on the cluster reports:
node1# gnt-cluster verify
Mon Oct 26 18:30:08 2009 * Verifying global settings
Mon Oct 26 18:30:08 2009 * Gathering data (3 nodes)
Mon Oct 26 18:30:10 2009 * Verifying node status
Mon Oct 26 18:30:10 2009 - ERROR: node node3: unallocated drbd minor 0 is in use
Mon Oct 26 18:30:10 2009 - ERROR: node node3: unallocated drbd minor 1 is in use
Mon Oct 26 18:30:10 2009 * Verifying instance status
Mon Oct 26 18:30:10 2009 - ERROR: instance instance4: instance should not run on node node3
Mon Oct 26 18:30:10 2009 * Verifying orphan volumes
Mon Oct 26 18:30:10 2009 - ERROR: node node3: volume 22459cf8-117d-4bea-a1aa-791667d07800.disk0_data is unknown
Mon Oct 26 18:30:10 2009 - ERROR: node node3: volume 1aaf4716-e57f-4101-a8d6-03af5da9dc50.disk0_data is unknown
Mon Oct 26 18:30:10 2009 - ERROR: node node3: volume 1aaf4716-e57f-4101-a8d6-03af5da9dc50.disk0_meta is unknown
Mon Oct 26 18:30:10 2009 - ERROR: node node3: volume 22459cf8-117d-4bea-a1aa-791667d07800.disk0_meta is unknown
Mon Oct 26 18:30:10 2009 * Verifying remaining instances
Mon Oct 26 18:30:10 2009 * Verifying N+1 Memory redundancy
Mon Oct 26 18:30:10 2009 * Other Notes
Mon Oct 26 18:30:10 2009 * Hooks Results
node1#
As you can see, instance4 has a copy running on node3, because we forced the failover when node3 failed. This case is dangerous as the instance will have the same IP and MAC address, wreaking havok on the network environment and anyone who tries to use it.
Ganeti doesn’t directly handle this case. It is recommended to logon to node3 and run:
node3# xm destroy instance4
There are still unallocated DRBD minors on node3. Again, these are not handled by Ganeti directly and need to be cleaned up via DRBD commands:
node3# drbdsetup /dev/drbd0 down
node3# drbdsetup /dev/drbd1 down
node3#
At this point, the only remaining problem should be the so-called orphan volumes. This can happen also in the case of an aborted disk-replace, or similar situation where Ganeti was not able to recover automatically. Here you need to remove them manually via LVM commands:
node3# lvremove xenvg
Do you really want to remove active logical volume "22459cf8-117d-4bea-a1aa-791667d07800.disk0_data"? [y/n]: y
Logical volume "22459cf8-117d-4bea-a1aa-791667d07800.disk0_data" successfully removed
Do you really want to remove active logical volume "22459cf8-117d-4bea-a1aa-791667d07800.disk0_meta"? [y/n]: y
Logical volume "22459cf8-117d-4bea-a1aa-791667d07800.disk0_meta" successfully removed
Do you really want to remove active logical volume "1aaf4716-e57f-4101-a8d6-03af5da9dc50.disk0_data"? [y/n]: y
Logical volume "1aaf4716-e57f-4101-a8d6-03af5da9dc50.disk0_data" successfully removed
Do you really want to remove active logical volume "1aaf4716-e57f-4101-a8d6-03af5da9dc50.disk0_meta"? [y/n]: y
Logical volume "1aaf4716-e57f-4101-a8d6-03af5da9dc50.disk0_meta" successfully removed
node3#
At this point cluster verify shouldn’t complain anymore:
node1# gnt-cluster verify
Mon Oct 26 18:37:51 2009 * Verifying global settings
Mon Oct 26 18:37:51 2009 * Gathering data (3 nodes)
Mon Oct 26 18:37:53 2009 * Verifying node status
Mon Oct 26 18:37:53 2009 * Verifying instance status
Mon Oct 26 18:37:53 2009 * Verifying orphan volumes
Mon Oct 26 18:37:53 2009 * Verifying remaining instances
Mon Oct 26 18:37:53 2009 * Verifying N+1 Memory redundancy
Mon Oct 26 18:37:53 2009 * Other Notes
Mon Oct 26 18:37:53 2009 * Hooks Results
node1#
Since redundant instances in Ganeti have a primary/secondary model, it is needed to leave aside on each node enough memory so that if one of its peer node fails, all the secondary instances that have that node as primary can be relocated. More specifically, if instance2 has node1 as primary and node2 as secondary (and node1 and node2 do not have any other instances in this layout), then it means that node2 must have enough free memory so that if node1 fails, we can failover instance2 without any other operations (for reducing the downtime window). Let’s increase the memory of the current instances to 4G, and add three new instances, two on node2:node3 with 8GB of RAM and one on node1:node2, with 12GB of RAM (numbers chosen so that we run out of memory):
node1# gnt-instance modify -B memory=4G instance1
Modified instance instance1
- be/memory -> 4096
Please don't forget that these parameters take effect only at the next start of the instance.
node1# gnt-instance modify …
node1# gnt-instance add -t drbd -n node2:node3 -s 512m -B memory=8G -o debootstrap instance5
…
node1# gnt-instance add -t drbd -n node2:node3 -s 512m -B memory=8G -o debootstrap instance6
…
node1# gnt-instance add -t drbd -n node1:node2 -s 512m -B memory=8G -o debootstrap instance7
node1# gnt-instance reboot --all
The reboot will operate on 7 instances.
Do you want to continue?
Affected instances:
instance1
instance2
instance3
instance4
instance5
instance6
instance7
y/[n]/?: y
Submitted jobs 677, 678, 679, 680, 681, 682, 683
Waiting for job 677 for instance1...
Waiting for job 678 for instance2...
Waiting for job 679 for instance3...
Waiting for job 680 for instance4...
Waiting for job 681 for instance5...
Waiting for job 682 for instance6...
Waiting for job 683 for instance7...
node1#
We rebooted instances for the memory changes to have effect. Now the cluster looks like:
node1# gnt-node list
Node DTotal DFree MTotal MNode MFree Pinst Sinst
node1 1.3T 1.3T 32.0G 1.0G 6.5G 4 1
node2 1.3T 1.3T 32.0G 1.0G 10.5G 3 4
node3 1.3T 1.3T 32.0G 1.0G 30.5G 0 2
node1# gnt-cluster verify
Mon Oct 26 18:59:36 2009 * Verifying global settings
Mon Oct 26 18:59:36 2009 * Gathering data (3 nodes)
Mon Oct 26 18:59:37 2009 * Verifying node status
Mon Oct 26 18:59:37 2009 * Verifying instance status
Mon Oct 26 18:59:37 2009 * Verifying orphan volumes
Mon Oct 26 18:59:37 2009 * Verifying remaining instances
Mon Oct 26 18:59:37 2009 * Verifying N+1 Memory redundancy
Mon Oct 26 18:59:37 2009 - ERROR: node node2: not enough memory on to accommodate failovers should peer node node1 fail
Mon Oct 26 18:59:37 2009 * Other Notes
Mon Oct 26 18:59:37 2009 * Hooks Results
node1#
The cluster verify error above shows that if node1 fails, node2 will not have enough memory to failover all primary instances on node1 to it. To solve this, you have a number of options:
In case a node has problems with the network (usually the secondary network, as problems with the primary network will render the node unusable for ganeti commands), it will show up in cluster verify as:
node1# gnt-cluster verify
Mon Oct 26 19:07:19 2009 * Verifying global settings
Mon Oct 26 19:07:19 2009 * Gathering data (3 nodes)
Mon Oct 26 19:07:23 2009 * Verifying node status
Mon Oct 26 19:07:23 2009 - ERROR: node node1: tcp communication with node 'node3': failure using the secondary interface(s)
Mon Oct 26 19:07:23 2009 - ERROR: node node2: tcp communication with node 'node3': failure using the secondary interface(s)
Mon Oct 26 19:07:23 2009 - ERROR: node node3: tcp communication with node 'node1': failure using the secondary interface(s)
Mon Oct 26 19:07:23 2009 - ERROR: node node3: tcp communication with node 'node2': failure using the secondary interface(s)
Mon Oct 26 19:07:23 2009 - ERROR: node node3: tcp communication with node 'node3': failure using the secondary interface(s)
Mon Oct 26 19:07:23 2009 * Verifying instance status
Mon Oct 26 19:07:23 2009 * Verifying orphan volumes
Mon Oct 26 19:07:23 2009 * Verifying remaining instances
Mon Oct 26 19:07:23 2009 * Verifying N+1 Memory redundancy
Mon Oct 26 19:07:23 2009 * Other Notes
Mon Oct 26 19:07:23 2009 * Hooks Results
node1#
This shows that both node1 and node2 have problems contacting node3 over the secondary network, and node3 has problems contacting them. From this output is can be deduced that since node1 and node2 can communicate between themselves, node3 is the one having problems, and you need to investigate its network settings/connection.
Since live migration can sometimes fail and leave the instance in an inconsistent state, Ganeti provides a --cleanup argument to the migrate command that does:
It is always safe to run this command as long as the instance has good data on its primary node (i.e. not showing as degraded). If so, you can simply run:
node1# gnt-instance migrate --cleanup instance1
Instance instance1 will be recovered from a failed migration. Note
that the migration procedure (including cleanup) is **experimental**
in this version. This might impact the instance if anything goes
wrong. Continue?
y/[n]/?: y
Mon Oct 26 19:13:49 2009 Migrating instance instance1
Mon Oct 26 19:13:49 2009 * checking where the instance actually runs (if this hangs, the hypervisor might be in a bad state)
Mon Oct 26 19:13:49 2009 * instance confirmed to be running on its primary node (node2)
Mon Oct 26 19:13:49 2009 * switching node node1 to secondary mode
Mon Oct 26 19:13:50 2009 * wait until resync is done
Mon Oct 26 19:13:50 2009 * changing into standalone mode
Mon Oct 26 19:13:50 2009 * changing disks into single-master mode
Mon Oct 26 19:13:50 2009 * wait until resync is done
Mon Oct 26 19:13:51 2009 * done
node1#
If you see something like the following when trying to shutdown or deactivate disks for an instance:
node1# gnt-instance shutdown instance1
Mon Oct 26 19:16:23 2009 - WARNING: Could not shutdown block device disk/0 on node node2: drbd0: can't shutdown drbd device: /dev/drbd0: State change failed: (-12) Device is held open by someone\n
It most likely means something is holding open the underlying DRBD device. This can be bad if the instance is not running, as it might mean that there was concurrent access from both the node and the instance to the disks, but not always (e.g. you could only have had the partitions activated via kpartx).
To troubleshoot this issue you need to follow standard Linux practices, and pay attention to the hypervisor being used:
For Xen, check if it’s not using the disks itself:
node1# xenstore-ls /local/domain/0/backend/vbd|grep -e "domain =" -e physical-device
domain = "instance2"
physical-device = "93:0"
domain = "instance3"
physical-device = "93:1"
domain = "instance4"
physical-device = "93:2"
node1#
You can see in the above output that the node exports three disks, to three instances. The physical-device key is in major:minor format in hexadecimal, and 0x93 represents DRBD’s major number. Thus we can see from the above that instance2 has /dev/drbd0, instance3 /dev/drbd1, and instance4 /dev/drbd2.
LUXI is the protocol used for communication between clients and the master daemon. Starting in Ganeti 2.3, the peers exchange their version in each message. When they don’t match, an error is raised:
$ gnt-node modify -O yes node3
Unhandled Ganeti error: LUXI version mismatch, server 2020000, request 2030000
Usually this means that server and client are from different Ganeti versions or import their libraries from different, consistent paths (e.g. an older version installed in another place). You can print the import path for Ganeti’s modules using the following command (note that depending on your setup you might have to use an explicit version in the Python command, e.g. python2.6):
python -c 'import ganeti; print ganeti.__file__'